SSU - Student Theater Ensemble - 12 Angry Jurors

WIthin the past two years, this nation has been bombarded with tragedies being told to us through social media. Most frequently recent, cases of police officers severely harming suspects for crimes, or reasons, not always clear. The positions of who is more violent towards the other have varied through every case, likewise to the opinions of spectators. Through social media, spectators have all developed their own opinions on the cases based on the evidence they have read about or their own speculations based on their own personal reasons. With that said, there never has the opinions of other spectators been more important than in the realms of courtroom juries. Some jurors have based their verdicts on their opinion on either the crime or the suspect higher than the evidence that is hidden deeper between the lines. Negating said evidence all together. These episodes have occurred for a very long time, since the use of courtroom juries began. 
-The Story:
In 1964, Reginald Rose wrote a stage adaptation of, "Twelve Angry Men", based on the teleplay he wrote ten years earlier. The play takes place in 1954 in a jurors room in a local courthouse. There are twelve jurors present discussing the case of the defendant, a colored teenager who is accused of stabbing his father to death out in public. The jurors must come to a unanimous verdict of guilty or not guilty, and all vote guilty in the beginning until one of the jurors votes not guilty. The lone juror tries to convince the rest of the jury that the case is not so easily one-sided as they originally thought, despite the (often prejudice) stubbornness of the other jurors. What starts out as an easily one-sided verdict progresses into a battle between logic and strategy against stubbornness and prejudice to move the verdict to another side.
Salem State University presents the Student Theatre Ensemble (STE)'s adaptation of Rose's play, with the style of later productions. In which the setting is somewhat modern day, instead of the early 1950's, and the cast, which originally consisted of a all male cast, now includes male and female performers, changing the title from "Twelve Angry Men," to "Twelve Angry Jurors."

-Honorable Mentions:

Each character in this play has no names, they only go by their juror numbers, with the exception of the Foreman (who manages the group), the security guard (who guards the door outside), and the Judge and Clerk (both voice over). The cast do a very good job with their performances. Because this play was originally written in the 50's, the dialogue from most of the characters comes off as corny and somewhat stereotypical. But, honestly it makes the performances fun to watch. Out of all the arguing and conflicts that transpires in the jury room, the most intense conflict is between Juror Eight and Juror Three. Juror Eight being the only juror that votes not guilty and Juror Three being the juror that wants to see the defendant pay for his crime more than anyone else in the room. Each character is given an equal share in the spotlight, allowing the story to show that there is more to them than originally expected. However, the two performances that stand out the most are the two opposing jurors. Juror EIght, played by Jodi Buoncuore, plays a very strong-hearted and determined woman who simply wants true justice to be served where it is deserved. Buoncuore (who was previously in STE's production of Circle Mirror Transformation) has the attributes that make an empowering female lead. The kind that audiences can get behind and route for every step of the way. Juror Three, played by Ted Silva, plays the perfect antagonist. A true opposite to juror Eight. Stubborn, vengeful, hot-headed, but most importantly passionate about what he believes is true justice. Despite how one dimensionally cruel the character is, Silva still manages to make the character enjoyable to watch. He makes the character funny, annoying, intensely intimidating, yet also sympathetic. You can tell that there is something the character is hiding which causes him to be in this mind-set, but you don't need it spelled out for you. Which is what SIlva does perfectly.

-What I didn't like?

As I said earlier, the play was originally written in 50's. Naturally, the dialogue in this production seems a little bit dated at times. It makes it hard to stay in the world these characters are in, when the majority of the time they are talking like they should be on Dragnet. For example, in the beginning of the play, after the group of jurors have entered the room and have gotten settled in, they start talking about themselves and the case all through exposition. One of the jurors, tells the group that she works in advertising. She says this numerous times throughout the show, and at first I found it funny. Until she kept mentioning the same thing at least five times, if not more. It started to get a little annoying to me, almost to the point where I kept thinking to myself, "We get it! You work in advertising! Please move on!" Not only that, but it's never fully established whether this production is suppose to take place in modern day or somewhere in the 50s. At the very top of the show, we hear a montage of different news stations covering many different homicide stories, All from modern day. yet we have characters enter the juror room dressed up like they're all from I Love Lucy.

-What I liked?

Despite the dialogue being very dated, I really did enjoy the performances from the cast, all around. Each character had a distinct personality. And the cast did a really good job portraying these personalities. Though 12 Angry Jurors is suppose to be a heavy courtroom drama, I think it had a good flow and it certainly knew when to lighten up and be a little funny once in a while. The story and the characters certainly know how to suck you into the case with them. When the group goes over the different demonstrations of how the murder may have gone down, you can't help but try to work with them in trying to figure out the truth. Even though the demonstrations themselves might seem a little dated and a lot more simple and innocent compared to days studies, I still think the clues they find are pretty creative.This show makes you want get into the case and try to solve the mystery along with them.

-Overall recommendation:
Samuel Lewis, the director of this production, took a classic drama and made it relevant due to the numerous tragedies effecting this country within the past two years. If ever there was a time to present this production to an audience consisting mostly of college students, it is now. If you are someone who feels strongly about any of the past tragedies occurring all across the country or the people that may have caused it or been a part of it, this show will most likely make you think twice before passing final judgement. 
Though some of the dialogue is a bit dated, and some things about the world building is unclear, this is still a well done courtroom drama. Definitely worth checking out. 12 Angry Jurors opens Thursday November 5th and runs until Sunday November 8th in the Metro room inside the Ellison Campus Center at Salem State University. Order tickets online by emailing stetickets@gmail.com or call the STE hotline at 978-542-7000.